Microsoft announced on October 26, in a memo from chief people officer Amy Coleman, a time-limited Voluntary Exit Offer for eligible employees in participating organizations in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States at level 70 and below. According to the memo, the offer gives employees who are considering a future outside the company a new choice to make that transition now with support, and gives participating organizations another way to adapt their workforce to changing needs. Participation varies with each business's priorities, customer commitments and workforce needs, and the offer builds on lessons from the company's earlier Voluntary Retirement Program.
The memo's body text does not mention AI, and a Microsoft spokesperson says, according to KUOW (also published by OPB), that AI is not driving the buyout programs; the spokesperson is not named, and the statement is the company's own position. The memo mentions financial support and career planning resources but no amounts and no end date; that the terms resemble the company's standard severance is the spokesperson's description in the press. The figure of 60,000 is not in the memo but comes from press coverage (including TechCrunch and Business Insider), and refers to the number who can receive the offer, not how many accept – no such figure exists. According to OPB, about 30 percent of those eligible accepted the offer in the earlier Voluntary Retirement Program, and Microsoft expects a lower share this time, per the same source.
For the Nordics … The memo's list of countries includes no Nordic country, so the offer as announced does not reach Microsoft's employees in the Nordics; whether participating organizations with Nordic staff are affected indirectly is an open question. The Nordic point is one of method: DNB said on October 6 that agentic AI was one driver of about 400 full-time positions, while a Microsoft spokesperson tells KUOW that AI is not the reason for the offer – the difference in what the companies themselves state is the point, not a similarity between the cases. The question for Finansforbundet in Norway and for Unionen and Finansförbundet in Sweden is how an instrument such as Norway's October 2 intent agreement on responsible AI in working life, which is built on dialogue about AI use and places no new obligations on individual employers, relates to a case where the employer's spokesperson, according to the press, denies an AI link.
Source: Microsoft, OPB, KUOW, TechCrunch, DNB (via Inderes), Regjeringen.no